- Practice Areas
- Video Center
- Case Results
No Win No Fee Guarantee
On February 13, 2020, the FDA announced two developments in its assessment of the weight lost drugs Belviq and Belviq XR:
The FDA further advised PATIENTS TO IMMEDIATELY STOP TAKING THE DRUG and carefully discard any unused doses. Many users of Belviq have been questioning whether this constitutes a Belviq recall, or how a voluntary withdrawal from the market differs from a Belviq recall, if it differs at all.
Here, we will examine what the FDA’s statement means, and what it may tell us regarding the risks of Belviq.
The FDA is the Food and Drug Administration of the United States. Within the FDA, the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (“CDER”) approves medications, conducts trials, and makes recommendations on items to be removed from market.
The FDA defines a drug recall as follows:
A drug recall is the most effective way to protect the public from a defective or potentially harmful product. A recall is a voluntary action taken by a company at any time to remove a defective drug product from the market.
Any recall must implement a formal Recall Plan. This plan must also include a Recall Letter to be sent out to affected persons. This Recall Letter must convey:
No. By definition, a recall is a voluntary action taken by a company to remove a drug product from the market. Drug recalls may be initiated on a company’s own initiative or by FDA request. In short, only a company can “recall” its own drug.
A recall is an alternative to an FDA-initiated court action removing or correcting violative products distributed by a manufacturer. A recall may be undertaken voluntarily and at any time by manufacturers and distributors, or at the request of the FDA. A request by the FDA that a firm recall a product is reserved for urgent situations and is directed to the firm that has primary responsibility for the manufacture and marketing of the product that is to be recalled.
A recall does not include market withdrawal or a stock recovery. A market withdrawal, as addressed further below, is a firm’s removal of a distributed product.
Just because the FDA does not directly issue the recall for a drug does not mean it does not play a role. The FDA is often the initiator of the recall process, and plays an important supervisory role throughout.
The FDA oversees the company’s strategy and assesses the adequacy of a drug manufacturer’s recall. Perhaps most importantly, the FDA classifies the recall. This means the FDA assigns a rating to each recall. This important step alerts consumers to the urgency and danger associated with any recall.
The FDA uses three recall classifications, known generally as Class I, Class II, or Class III. The FDA defines these as follows:
These classifications are essential to alert the public to potential safety issues. For example, while labeling issues are a necessity in the drug-manufacturing realm, many violations may be unlikely to harm Americans who have been properly taking the medication. In contrast, a Class 1 Recall communicates that the product itself is dangerous, and poses a safety concern.
The FDA also evaluates the procedures and effectiveness of a recall. The FDA assesses whether the manufacturer has properly notified customers of the recall, and promptly removed the product from the market. If the FDA determines a recall has been ineffective, it will request that the manufacturer take additional actions.
Other than requesting a formal recall, the FDA has several other ways it can request drug manufacturers make corrections or remove drugs from circulation. These include:
Finally, the FDA can also request a Withdrawal from Market—which is exactly what the FDA has done for Belviq. We will discuss what this process is, how it differs from the above, and why the FDA may have used this tool here.
The FDA defines a market withdrawal as:
A firm’s removal or correction of a distributed product which involves a minor violation that would not be subject to legal action by the FDA.
On its face, this may sound less serious than a recall. However, the FDA has made very clear that it believes the risks of taking Belviq outweigh the benefits, and has asked Patients to stop taking the drug. These warnings sound very similar to the criteria used for a Class I recall.
In February, the FDA announced several significant health concerns regarding the use of Belviq. A 5-year trial found people taking these drugs were more likely to develop several types of cancer. Compared to patients taking a placebo, Belviq patients had an increased rate of multiple types of cancer such as:
The FDA advised PATIENTS TO IMMEDIATELY STOP TAKING THE DRUG and carefully discard any unused doses. The FDA asked doctors to follow up with their patients and inform them of these risks. The FDA further confirmed that the risks of taking Belviq outweigh the benefits.
However, the FDA requested that Eisai Inc. withdraw Belviq from the market—which does not constitute a formal recall. This likely because all goals of a drug recall can be met by simply withdrawing Belviq from the market. Therefore, this decision may not be a reflection of the possible dangers of Belviq. As outlined above, a recall plan and recall letter must notify users of the following:
The FDA meets all of these goals by requesting a withdrawal of Belviq, putting doctors on notice of the potential risks, and advising patients to destroy any pills left in circulation.
The most notable factual consideration is that, unlike a medical device, there is little need to actively retrieve or replace Belviq. By asking Eisai to withdraw Belviq from the market, new bottles of Belviq are effectively immediately out of circulation.
Belviq is available by prescription only. This means Belviq is not littering store shelves or available in bulk to consumers. Because patients must take Belviq daily, by cutting off supply lines, Belviq will quickly become unavailable.
The FDA has also issued warnings to doctors, advising them of the risks of this drug. The FDA can reasonably expect doctors to follow the FDA’s advice and cease renewing prescriptions and/or immediately advise their patients to stop using Belviq. Again, this action by the FDA prevents any future Belviq pills from getting into circulation.
By asking patients to stop using the Belviq in their possession, the FDA seeks to discontinue use. Effectively, this will end use of Belviq before the supply lines for Belviq have run their course.
The FDA reserves the most serious type of recall for drugs that “could cause serious health problems or death.” Here, the FDA has announced that taking Belviq and Belviq XR could increase the risk of cancer—easily a serious health problem. So why has the FDA not asked for a recall? The simple answer likely is that it just did not need to do so.
As outlined above, because Belviq is a regulated substance, the FDA is effectively able to achieve many of the same goals of a recall by simply asking for a withdrawal from the market. Unlike a medical device that may need a surgical procedure to remove, or food items that may be lingering in persons’ homes, the FDA can remove prescription drugs like Belviq from circulation through the withdrawal process. This allows quick and effective action with minimal delays.
Not very often. Despite the broad criteria used for withdrawing items from the market, the FDA still uses this tool very sparingly. From 1994 to 2015, the FDA reported only 215 incidences where it determined a drug should be withdrawn from market. Of these, only 11 of them, or 5.1 percent, included the FDA’s determination that the drug should be withdrawn from sale for safety or effectiveness reasons. Reports issued by the FDA indicate only 600 drugs have ever been withdrawn for these reasons. Belviq now joins this very narrow list.
According to several reports, Eisai has an approximate annual revenue of $5.8 billion and over 10,000 employees throughout the world. Companies this big and powerful understand how to defend themselves and will exercise their legal rights to do so when challenged. People who believe they have been harmed by Belviq or Belviq XR should make sure they obtain proper legal advice before deciding how to proceed. Defendants in these lawsuits will employ highly skilled defense attorneys given their vast resources. Consumers need to counteract that form of help with legal help of their own.
If you or someone you love has been harmed as a result of this medication, you need to seek the help of Belviq lawyers who understand what it takes to hold even the largest corporations accountable for the harm they inflict on consumers.
U.S. News and World Report named Gomez Trial Attorneys a top law firm, including naming the firm and its attorneys “Best Lawyers”, “Super Lawyers”, and “Lawyer of the Year”. Gomez Trial Attorneys have been named Top Lawyers in a variety of fields, including products liability and mass torts. Over the past ten years, our San Diego personal injury attorneys have collected over $350 million in verdicts and settlements with more than 60 awards of more than one million dollars each. Gomez Trial Attorneys are experienced in taking on big Pharma and drug manufacturers, regardless of their size.
Contact Gomez Trial Attorneys today to schedule a free initial consultation.
No Fees Unless We Recover Money On Your Behalf