- Practice Areas
- Video Center
- Case Results
No Win No Fee Guarantee
Rideshares are all the rage in San Diego and beyond, with passengers viewing this mode of transportation as a safe and relatively inexpensive way to get around town. However, for many passengers, the rideshare experience has been anything but safe. Furthermore, the additional insurance considerations of a rideshare accident often confuse those wishing to pursue compensation for the injuries they suffered.
If you were hurt in a rideshare accident in San Diego, the experienced Uber and Lyft lawyers at Gomez Trial Attorneys can help you understand the legal process and help you seek compensation. Call a San Diego Based injury attorney today to see how we can help you.
Uber and Lyft both require drivers who wish to contract with them to produce proof of current personal automobile insurance and to keep copies of their insurance cards. In addition, both companies carry an insurance policy of up to a million dollars for their riders. However, how much of that policy is available in the event of an accident depends on when the accident takes place.
Both companies offer tiered insurance that essentially goes like this:
In addition to the potential of being involved in a motor vehicle accident or a physical assault taking place, in one recent year more than 3,000 sexual assaults took place involving Uber drivers and their passengers. Other risks to rideshare drivers and passengers include:
Uber and Lyft attempt to shield themselves from much of the legal responsibility for incidents occurring between riders and passengers simply in the way that they word their agreement with drivers. Uber stated multiple times in a deposition that they have “zero” drivers. Instead, Uber contends that the drivers who apply for affiliation with the company are third-party transportation providers, driver-partners, or independent contractors. This not only reduces the liability that these companies have for accidents caused by drivers, but also helps the company avoid costly items such as minimum wage for workers and benefits.
Some states are seeking to change the way rideshare companies classify drivers. California’s AB5 went into effect but was immediately met with legal battles. The law not only targets the rideshare industry, but also other gig economy jobs such as freelance writing. Uber and Lyft have both joined the effort to either overturn the law or get an exception to its requirements. A proposed federal law would also target the misclassification of employees as independent contractors. New York State is also looking at ways to change the way rideshare companies classify their drivers.
If, either through lawmakers or courts, Uber and Lyft are determined to be employers for their drivers, it will likely lead to added liability when accidents and incidents occur involving drivers and their passengers.
Besides Uber or Lyft, the potentially liable parties in car accidents involving rideshares include:
For a party to be liable for the accident that caused your injuries, you must be able to demonstrate that:
In 2008, two men were visiting Paris. They wanted to go out, but couldn’t find a cab. It was this experience that led, a few years later, to the advent of Uber, the first rideshare service of its kind. Before long, Uber was catching on. People were taking rides regularly and the service was expanded from San Francisco to various cities throughout the nation and the world.
Ten years later, more than 600 cities had Uber drivers available and ready to pick up passengers. As with all intriguing ideas, Uber soon faced competition in the form of Lyft, who operated with essentially the same concept. While other rideshare companies have come and gone since then, Uber and Lyft hold the bulk of the market share for this type of service, though Lyft focuses only on ridesharing in North America, while Uber’s efforts are global.
Both Uber and Lyft provide different services within their overall business model, including larger cars for larger groups, luxury cars, and less expensive programs for riders who don’t mind sharing their rideshare with another passenger who is traveling to the same area. Passengers using either Uber or Lyft can schedule their rides in advance, can rate their drivers (and drivers can rate them, as well), and can share their location with family and friends who are concerned about whether they get home safe.
Around 36 percent of the U.S. population has now utilized a ridesharing service. Around 95 million people use Uber’s services each month worldwide, while Lyft has a monthly ridership of around 32 million in North America. About a quarter of the people in the U.S. use ridesharing services at least once a month, often when they are going to or coming home from dinner or a party. Passengers are most often drawn to the rideshare app because of the convenience it provides.
The concept is simple, and it involves a smartphone app on which people can order and pay for one-way trips from individuals who are accepted by the rideshare company as independent contractor drivers. These drivers, who are required to meet certain criteria set by the company, accept the passenger on the same app and are provided with details about where the passenger needs to be picked up and dropped off. Payment for the ride is handled through the app so that no money needs to be exchanged between the driver and the passenger.
Despite the simple concept, concerns have risen along with the popularity of ridesharing. Read on for more information about those concerns.
A rideshare passenger in San Diego was killed and three other people were injured after a suspected drunk driver rear-ended a Lyft car in the early morning hours. The accident occurred on State Route 163, near the Uptown area. A 21-year-old woman driving a Lexus struck the rear end of a Mazda sedan. The accident caused both vehicles to drift off the freeway and into a ditch. A backseat passenger in the Mazda—which was the Lyft vehicle—was seated on the left side of the vehicle and wearing a seat belt. He died at the scene and emergency workers had to remove part of the vehicle’s roof to get him out of the car.
Another backseat Lyft passenger was not wearing his seat belt and was ejected from the vehicle. He suffered major injuries. The 27-year-old Lyft driver was wearing his seat belt and suffered moderate injuries. The driver of the Lexus suffered major injuries in the crash. All of the injured individuals were transported to the hospital.
Accidents like this are unfortunately far too common.
Both Uber and Lyft have been resistant to releasing data to the public that would shed light on exactly how many accidents their drivers are involved in each year. That said, Uber did release a safety report for its U.S. rideshare operations that provided the following information:
Uber also shared some statistics on fatal physical assaults that occurred during Uber rides:
Uber logged 1.3 billion rides in one year.
A study from Rice University and the University of Chicago revealed that there is an uptick in fatal accidents in cities where rideshares operate. This increase coincides with an increase in vehicle miles traveled, which is likely due—in part—to “deadheading”. Deadheading is a term used for drivers who have dropped off a passenger and are driving around waiting for their next ride. The increase in fatal accidents is estimated at 2-3 percent. However, Uber and Lyft dispute the study’s findings.
If you were injured in a rideshare accident, you deserve to have the legal information and guidance that you need to recover the compensation to pay for your recovery. Gomez Trial Attorneys is consistently ranked among the top law firms in the country by U.S. News & World Report, and we have obtained more than $500 million for our clients over the past 20 years.
Contact the experienced rideshare lawyers at Gomez Trial Attorneys online or at (619) 237-3490 today for a free consultation.
No Fees Unless We Recover Money On Your Behalf